Roman sex gay
The Secret Male Sex Workers of Ancient Rome
It’s a widely accepted fact amongst historians that ancient Rome was a pretty horny place, at least until Emperor Theodosius I cracked down on “heretics” and made Christianity the default religion in 380 A.D.
Before then, guys fucked other guys frequently. Sodomy wasn’t criminalized, terms enjoy “gay” didn’t be and masculininity was glorified, so it was perfectly normal for bros to lust after other bros (though it was written into law that the “top” had to be of a higher social status than the “bottom”). Books about ancient Rome allude to salacious stories of riotous orgies and polygamous emperors, too. Nero, who reigned between 54 and 68 A.D., even married a male slave named Sporus, but only after castrating him and treating him appreciate a woman.
Prostitution was a little trickier, though. Though sex was queer and rampant, the profession was seemingly stigmatized, and it was mainly “lower-class” women who worked in brothels (despite their jobs being a driving force of the ancient Roman economy). Much less is known about their male counterparts, though. Despite the bevy of evidence that some extremely kinky behavior took place i
Este artigo também está disponível em: PortuguêsEspañol
For the Romans, homosexuality wasn’t seen as something bad or sinful – but it was also not a produce for admiration and pride. Gay sex in ancient Rome was accepted even among the military. History suggests that Roman society did not even view sexuality as a spectrum as we do today; in Rome people were essentially indifferent to sexual orientation.
Although there was no punishment for homosexuality, it was not successfully regarded who played the bottom role. There was a lot of prejudice in the following and the feminine. It was perfectly acceptable for a Roman man to have sex with another man, as long as he was the highest of the bond. Domination was at the heart of what it meant to be a Roman.
Rome take over the world for centuries of ceaseless wars. Friedrich Nietzsche refers to the Roman spirit as “the seat of power”. This obsession with power fed all parts of Roman society, including sex.
Part of the power was linked to the slavery life; Romans acquired and bought slaves to increase their status. An corresponding for nowadays is how we decide a person’s authority and influence: by
As Pompeii’s House of the Vettii finally reopens after a long process of restoration, news outlets emerge to be struggling with how to report on the Roman sex cultures so well recorded in the ruins of the city.
The Metro opened with the headline “Lavish Pompeii home that doubled as a brothel has some interesting wall art”, while the Guardian highlighted the fresco of Priapus, the god of fertility (depicted weighing his oversized penis on a scale with bags of coins) as well as the erotic frescoes found next to the kitchen.
The Daily Mail, on the other hand – and arguably surprisingly – said nothing about the explicit frescoes and instead centred its story on the house’s “historic hallmarks of interior design”.
As a scholar who researches modern and contemporary visual cultures of sexuality, I was struck by how the heavy presence of sexual imagery in the ruins of Pompeii seems to confound those writing about it for a general audience.
Rethinking Roman sexuality
As a gay man and a researcher on sexuality, I am all too familiar with the ways modern gay men see to ancient Rome in search of evidence that there have always been people like us.
It is now clear among the research
In honour of LGBTQIA+ history month, Ancient History alumni Ollie Burns takes a closer look at the social, political, and cultural implications of homosexuality in ancient Rome.
Trigger Warning: sexual violence, homophobia, paedophilia, nudity.
The presentation and awareness of homosexuality in the Roman world was vastly different than how it is today, and gives us an example of how homosexuality has been indelibly linked with communications of authority and authority in antiquity. The Latin language has no synonyms for either heterosexual or lesbian, and instead partners in a sexual relationship would be presented as either active, synonymous with masculinity, or passive and therefore, feminine, regardless of the gender of the individuals involved. Freeborn male Romans had the civil liberty to do as they pleased when it came to sexual activity, and as such, the concept of a Roman man engaging in homosexual sex was in no way controversial or taboo to the Romans, as long as it fell within certain parameters.
Rome was a deeply militarised state, with conquest and dominance deeply ingrained as desirable masculine traits. As a result of this, men were free to engage in